WA · Safeguard Mechanism 2024–25

Macedon

WOODSIDE ENERGY GLOBAL PTY LTD
📍 WA

The Safeguard Mechanism requires Australia's largest industrial facilities to keep net emissions under a legislated, stepping-down baseline — or offset the difference with carbon credits.

Macedon reported emissions +13 kt above its baseline in 2024–25. The 13 kt overage was covered by purchasing ACCUs.
Source: Clean Energy Regulator · data as at 25 Oct 2026
113 kt
2024–25 emissions CER
100 kt
net baseline obligation CER
+13 kt
vs baseline Zerra calc.
13,092
ACCUs surrendered CER

Reported emissions vs baseline, 2024–25

Red bars indicate emissions above baseline — covered by carbon credit purchases
0t32kt63kt95kt127kt24–25 Emissions Overage Baseline

Credit surrenders — Macedon

YearEmissionsBaseline Gap†ACCUsSMCsCompliance†
24–25 113 kt 100 kt +13 kt 13,092 — ACCU buyer

Emissions, baseline, ACCUs and SMCs are reported directly by CER. †Gap and compliance category are calculated by Zerra from those figures.

What this means

Macedon is a facility operated by WOODSIDE ENERGY GLOBAL PTY LTD in WA. Like all covered facilities, industrial operations generate significant emissions. Under Australia's Safeguard Mechanism, Macedon must keep its annual emissions below a stepping-down baseline — or purchase carbon credits to cover any overage.

In 2024–25, Macedon reported emissions of 113 kt against a baseline obligation of 100 kt — an overage of 13 kt. The facility covered the 13 kt overage by purchasing 13,092 Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) — credits generated by carbon abatement projects elsewhere in Australia such as soil carbon farming, avoided land clearing, and landfill gas capture.

Purchasing credits is legal and intended by the Safeguard Mechanism's design — the policy deliberately allows facilities to choose between cutting on-site emissions or funding abatement elsewhere in the economy. Whether credit purchases represent genuine long-term decarbonisation depends on whether the facility's absolute emissions are trending down over time. The chart above shows the trajectory since reporting began. This question applies to all covered facilities under the Safeguard Mechanism, not Macedon specifically.

Among 8 comparable facilities, 8 reported emissions above their baseline in 2024–25. The table below compares Macedon with other facilities covered by the Safeguard Mechanism in the same classification.

Related facilities — Safeguard Mechanism 2024–25

Facility Operator State Emissions vs Baseline Compliance
North West Shelf Project Woodside Energy Ltd. WA 5.75 Mt +921 kt ACCU + SMC
Gorgon Operations CHEVRON AUSTRALIA PTY LTD WA 9.02 Mt +478 kt ACCU buyer
Gippsland Basin facility ESSO AUSTRALIA RESOURCES PTY LTD VIC 1.63 Mt +305 kt ACCU buyer
Montara Operations JADESTONE ENERGY (EAGLE) PTY LTD NT 284 kt +163 kt ACCU buyer
Queensland Curtis LNG Plant QCLNG Operating Company Pty Ltd QLD 1.86 Mt +158 kt ACCU + SMC
APLNG Facility CONOCOPHILLIPS AUSTRALIA OPERATIONS PTY LTD QLD 2.21 Mt +147 kt SMC buyer
Pluto LNG Woodside Burrup Pty. Ltd. WA 1.89 Mt +145 kt ACCU buyer
Varanus Hub Santos Limited WA 313 kt +85 kt ACCU + SMC
← All Safeguard facilities
Source: Clean Energy Regulator — Safeguard Mechanism data · All figures in tCO₂-e · Data updated annually on CER release
All data sourced from the Clean Energy Regulator (Australian Government). Zerra is an independent data platform and is not affiliated with any listed facility or operator.