Updates

Follow the data.

New data and updates — no noise. We'll let you know when something worth knowing happens.

Oil & Gas · VIC · Safeguard Mechanism 2023–24

Gippsland Basin facility

ESSO AUSTRALIA RESOURCES PTY LTD
📍 VICOil & GasABN 62 091 829 819Baseline: Production-adjusted baseline
Gippsland Basin facility reported emissions +156 kt above its baseline in 2023–24. The 156 kt overage was covered by purchasing ACCUs.
1.51 Mt
2023–24 emissions
1.35 Mt
net baseline obligation
+156 kt
vs baseline
155,994
ACCUs surrendered
Emissions history

Reported emissions vs baseline, 2024–2024

Red bars indicate emissions above baseline — covered by carbon credit purchases
0t422kt843kt1.3Mt1.7Mt24–25 Emissions Overage Baseline
Annual compliance record

Credit surrenders — Gippsland Basin facility

YearEmissionsBaseline GapACCUsSMCsCompliance
24–25 1.51 Mt 1.35 Mt +156 kt 155,994 ACCU buyer
Plain English

What this means

Gippsland Basin facility is a oil & gas facility operated by ESSO AUSTRALIA RESOURCES PTY LTD in VIC. Like all covered facilities, LNG processing, gas extraction and pipeline operations release methane and combustion emissions. Under Australia's Safeguard Mechanism, Gippsland Basin facility must keep its annual emissions below a stepping-down baseline — or purchase carbon credits to cover any overage.

In 2023–24, Gippsland Basin facility reported emissions of 1.51 Mt against a baseline obligation of 1.35 Mt — an overage of 156 kt. The facility covered the 156 kt overage by purchasing 155,994 Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) — credits generated by carbon abatement projects elsewhere in Australia such as soil carbon farming, avoided land clearing, and landfill gas capture.

Purchasing credits is legal and intended by the Safeguard Mechanism's design — the policy deliberately allows facilities to choose between cutting on-site emissions or funding abatement elsewhere in the economy. Whether credit purchases represent genuine long-term decarbonisation depends on whether the facility's absolute emissions are trending down over time. The chart above shows the trajectory since reporting began. This question applies to all covered facilities under the Safeguard Mechanism, not Gippsland Basin facility specifically.

Across the oil & gas sector, 8 of 8 covered facilities reported emissions above their baseline in 2023–24. The table below compares Gippsland Basin facility with other oil & gas facilities covered by the Safeguard Mechanism.

Other facilities — Oil & Gas

Oil & Gas facilities — Safeguard Mechanism 2023–24

Facility Operator State Emissions vs Baseline Compliance
Gippsland Basin facility ESSO AUSTRALIA RESOURCES PTY LTD VIC 1.51 Mt +156 kt ACCU buyer
Moomba Plant Santos Limited SA 2.20 Mt +148 kt ACCU buyer
Darwin LNG Plant Santos Limited NT 242 kt +142 kt ACCU buyer
APLNG Facility CONOCOPHILLIPS AUSTRALIA OPERATIONS PTY LTD QLD 2.12 Mt +86 kt SMC buyer
Queensland Curtis LNG Plant QCLNG Operating Company Pty Ltd QLD 1.94 Mt +73 kt ACCU buyer
Beharra Springs BEACH ENERGY LIMITED WA 145 kt +45 kt ACCU buyer
Varanus Hub Santos Limited WA 281 kt +44 kt ACCU buyer
Ballera Santos Limited QLD 154 kt +34 kt ACCU buyer
← All Safeguard facilities
Source: Clean Energy Regulator — Safeguard Mechanism published data 2023–24 · All figures in tCO₂-e · Methodology · Data updated annually on CER release
All data sourced from the Clean Energy Regulator (Australian Government). Zerra is an independent data platform and is not affiliated with any listed facility or operator.