WA · Safeguard Mechanism 2024–25

Karlawinda Gold Project

Capricorn Metals Limited
📍 WA

The Safeguard Mechanism requires Australia's largest industrial facilities to keep net emissions under a legislated, stepping-down baseline — or offset the difference with carbon credits.

Karlawinda Gold Project reported emissions +10 kt above its baseline in 2024–25. The 10 kt overage was covered by purchasing ACCUs.
Source: Clean Energy Regulator · data as at 25 Oct 2026
110 kt
2024–25 emissions CER
100 kt
net baseline obligation CER
+10 kt
vs baseline Zerra calc.
9,583
ACCUs surrendered CER

Reported emissions vs baseline, 2024–25

Red bars indicate emissions above baseline — covered by carbon credit purchases
0t31kt61kt92kt123kt24–25 Emissions Overage Baseline

Credit surrenders — Karlawinda Gold Project

YearEmissionsBaseline Gap†ACCUsSMCsCompliance†
24–25 110 kt 100 kt +10 kt 9,583 — ACCU buyer

Emissions, baseline, ACCUs and SMCs are reported directly by CER. †Gap and compliance category are calculated by Zerra from those figures.

What this means

Karlawinda Gold Project is a facility operated by Capricorn Metals Limited in WA. Like all covered facilities, industrial operations generate significant emissions. Under Australia's Safeguard Mechanism, Karlawinda Gold Project must keep its annual emissions below a stepping-down baseline — or purchase carbon credits to cover any overage.

In 2024–25, Karlawinda Gold Project reported emissions of 110 kt against a baseline obligation of 100 kt — an overage of 10 kt. The facility covered the 10 kt overage by purchasing 9,583 Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) — credits generated by carbon abatement projects elsewhere in Australia such as soil carbon farming, avoided land clearing, and landfill gas capture.

Purchasing credits is legal and intended by the Safeguard Mechanism's design — the policy deliberately allows facilities to choose between cutting on-site emissions or funding abatement elsewhere in the economy. Whether credit purchases represent genuine long-term decarbonisation depends on whether the facility's absolute emissions are trending down over time. The chart above shows the trajectory since reporting began. This question applies to all covered facilities under the Safeguard Mechanism, not Karlawinda Gold Project specifically.

Among 8 comparable facilities, 8 reported emissions above their baseline in 2024–25. The table below compares Karlawinda Gold Project with other facilities covered by the Safeguard Mechanism in the same classification.

Related facilities — Safeguard Mechanism 2024–25

Facility Operator State Emissions vs Baseline Compliance
Brockman 2 / Nammuldi Mines Hamersley Iron Pty. Limited WA 305 kt +153 kt ACCU buyer
Fimiston Operations KALGOORLIE CONSOLIDATED GOLD MINES PTY LTD WA 271 kt +146 kt ACCU + SMC
Solomon Mine FMG SOLOMON PTY LTD WA 471 kt +113 kt ACCU + SMC
Roy Hill Mine Roy Hill Holdings Pty Ltd WA 481 kt +87 kt ACCU buyer
Cloudbreak Mine CHICHESTER METALS PTY LTD WA 332 kt +85 kt ACCU + SMC
Gruyere Mine Site Gruyere Mining Company Pty Ltd WA 268 kt +77 kt ACCU buyer
Brockman 4 Mine Hamersley Iron Pty. Limited WA 233 kt +68 kt ACCU buyer
Newman Operations BHP IRON ORE PTY LTD WA 347 kt +65 kt ACCU buyer
← All Safeguard facilities
Source: Clean Energy Regulator — Safeguard Mechanism data · All figures in tCO₂-e · Data updated annually on CER release
All data sourced from the Clean Energy Regulator (Australian Government). Zerra is an independent data platform and is not affiliated with any listed facility or operator.