WA · Safeguard Mechanism 2017–18

RMS PORT HEDLAND

RIVET MINING SERVICES PTY LTD
📍 WA

The Safeguard Mechanism requires Australia's largest industrial facilities to keep net emissions under a legislated, stepping-down baseline — or offset the difference with carbon credits.

Not covered since 2017–18 — this facility's reported emissions have not reached the Safeguard Mechanism's 100,000t threshold since then. Figures below are its last reported year.
RMS PORT HEDLAND reported emissions +646 t above its baseline in 2017–18. The 646 t overage was covered by purchasing ACCUs.
Source: Clean Energy Regulator · data as at 25 Oct 2026
101 kt
2017–18 emissions CER
100 kt
net baseline obligation CER
+646 t
vs baseline Zerra calc.
646
ACCUs surrendered CER

Reported emissions vs baseline, 2017–18

Red bars indicate emissions above baseline — covered by carbon credit purchases
0t28kt56kt85kt113kt17–18 Emissions Overage Baseline

Credit surrenders — RMS PORT HEDLAND

YearEmissionsBaseline Gap†ACCUsSMCsCompliance†
17–18 101 kt 100 kt +646 t 646 — ACCU buyer

Emissions, baseline, ACCUs and SMCs are reported directly by CER. †Gap and compliance category are calculated by Zerra from those figures.

What this means

RMS PORT HEDLAND is a facility operated by RIVET MINING SERVICES PTY LTD in WA. Like all covered facilities, industrial operations generate significant emissions. Under Australia's Safeguard Mechanism, RMS PORT HEDLAND must keep its annual emissions below a stepping-down baseline — or purchase carbon credits to cover any overage.

In 2017–18, RMS PORT HEDLAND reported emissions of 101 kt against a baseline obligation of 100 kt — an overage of 646 t. The facility covered the 646 t overage by purchasing 646 Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) — credits generated by carbon abatement projects elsewhere in Australia such as soil carbon farming, avoided land clearing, and landfill gas capture.

Purchasing credits is legal and intended by the Safeguard Mechanism's design — the policy deliberately allows facilities to choose between cutting on-site emissions or funding abatement elsewhere in the economy. Whether credit purchases represent genuine long-term decarbonisation depends on whether the facility's absolute emissions are trending down over time. The chart above shows the trajectory since reporting began. This question applies to all covered facilities under the Safeguard Mechanism, not RMS PORT HEDLAND specifically.

Related facilities — Safeguard Mechanism 2017–18

No peer data available.

← All Safeguard facilities
Source: Clean Energy Regulator — Safeguard Mechanism data · All figures in tCO₂-e · Data updated annually on CER release
All data sourced from the Clean Energy Regulator (Australian Government). Zerra is an independent data platform and is not affiliated with any listed facility or operator.